A will does not include land, a house, etc. Users are encouraged to perform their own due diligence before signing up with any online service ..
The methodis differantium, the document that contained the elements of the theory of differentiation, was created in 1667 ..
The use of greatest and most importantly referring to calculus is hyperbole. To add in the bit about it weighing us down is contradictory ..
The current time is the moment the reader is reading the sentence. Dont bounce around within the paragraph as this student has done ..
Now, if we replace each sentence with the number of the corresponding idea, we can see what a jumbled mess this is 1, 2, 3, 4, 4, 5, 5, 4, 3 ..
Therefore, that motive cannot be imposed on themselves. In one day, johns attitude towards school changed for the better ..
Dont introduce a paragraph with one topic and then leap to another topic in the next sentence. Here is how this information should have been presented smiths ideas on the method of differentiation were gaining recognition in the mathematical community, which made it necessary for him to produce a document detailing all of his theories on the subject. Another of smiths ideas was the method of differentiation.
This sentence would be better worded this way the argument took years to unravel and never really came to a definitive decision. It should either end after london, beginning a new sentence with she then, or the she then should be changed to and. That is still awkward, and the sentence would be best written undoubtedly, jones was a genius, and this paper will demonstrate that by examining his entire life.
The addition of most importantly is awkward. Who is smiths genius? The student means smiths intellect, but an intellect cannot be productive. If you start from something, you go to or follow through to another something.
It should be written one motive of the sumerians concerning their algebra was to impose on themselves. It should say the royal society hosted a guest each week. Since he was not interested in publishing his work, he concentrated instead on pursuing a position as a professor.
Jones is the only one having the supposed discourse. You cant just say the underlying of widgetry. The document was created in 1667, it seems, but when did smith decide not to publish and seek work as a professor instead? Also 1667? It sounds like that was a very busy year for poor smith! The sentences themselves are also awkwardly constructed, making the entire thing hard to understand.
One does not speak orally in a publication. Does the student mean the natural, philosophical world, which would be the world described as both natural and philosophical? Or do they mean natural philosophical world, in which natural modifies philosophical and not world, in which case the grammatically correct phrase would be naturally philosophical world? In this publication, jones wrote of the belief systems of the natural, philosophical world around him. Had the student omitted the above sentences, however, the discussion of religion would have been completely out of place, given the essays topic. Who is questioning the value? There is no attribution to explain who questions it or to prove that it is questioned by anyone other than the student. A better wording would be do have an invisible force that we push against as it pushes back against us.
Newtons advancements are more likely to be funds paid in advance of publication. In this case, it was this century when. Smiths secretary that he was told many times, however, that smith was denied admission because of negative feelings that the deans wife held for him. I wonder if the source actually said that, or if the students paraphrasing has overstated the sources point that mathematics might be different without the advent of calculus. Are we to understand that all of the people in england failed to realize the importance of scientific advancement for an entire century? It would have been better if the student had said most people in england.
I cant believe the student read this over and found it comprehensible. In the judeo-christian context, this would mean something very bad, like murder. The student likely put the information in parentheses because the sentence was too awkwardly full of commas and clauses already. Gravity does not, in fact, weigh people down. Smith was brilliant in each of these fields, but he became known particularly for his contributions in the fields of philosophy, mathematics, and logistics.
He constructed the clock out of an old box. Try to avoid it unless something is truly essential. If the problems were too complex to approach, jones could not have approached them. Who is questioning the value? There is no attribution to explain who questions it or to prove that it is questioned by anyone other than the student. This might be because it would be difficult to prove in the face of the importance of newtonian physics. The comma in this sentence should not be there. Jones had been considered the sole inventor of the widgetiscope for fifteen years already, which gave him the upper hand. Be careful that you dont paraphrase in such a way as to claim a source said something that they did not. The declarations of superiority are superfluous, unattributed, probably erroneous, and possibly pandering. It has to be the underlying something of widgetry, whether that something is basis, foundation, etc.The links below provide concise advice on some fundamental elements of academic writing.